Articles

Show Me The Money! The Tangible Benefits of an Online Compliance Program

Show Me The Money! The Tangible Benefits of an Online Compliance Program Before I get into the number crunching, let’s revisit a few of the intangible benefits of a compliance program, because although they may not be producing direct profit for the organisation, these benefits are still helping to generate value and improve overall business performance.

Click Here To Read More

Why you NEED a Compliance Training Program

Why you NEED a Compliance Training ProgramA conversation our GRC reps often report having with senior managers and executives goes something like this:

“I know we need a compliance program – but in reality, we’ve never had a serious breech or been investigated by a regulator. Our people seem to do the right thing – why distract the business with another round of training they don’t want, before we really need to?”

As a compliance professional, how can you answer that? Here is one way.

Click Here To Read More

ACCC’s Compliance and Enforcement priorities for 2013

ACCCs Compliance and Enforcement priorities for 2013Each year the ACCC releases areas of enforcement they will be giving priority to. While all complaints are considered, the ACCC focuses on activities that result in widespread consumer detriment, and harm the competitive process. Some areas are considered so important to consumer protection they are always listed as priority, such as cartel conduct and anti-competitive agreements, and the misuse of market power. The ACCC reviews its priorities regularly. Click Here To Read More

New Anti-Cartel Conduct Laws Find First Mark

TNew Anti Cartel Conduct Laws Find First Markhe first decision to apply the latest amendments of the anti-cartel competition laws have resulted in damages of $22.4 million awarded to Norcast in an action against Bradken Limited for bid rigging and misleading and deceptive conduct. Two of Bradken’s directors, including former NSW Premier Nick Grenier were found accessorily liable. Significantly, the relevant conduct occurred outside Australia. Click Here To Read More

Avoid Public Whistle Blowers: Deal With Internal Complaints

Avoid Public Whistle Blowers: Deal With Internal ComplaintsWhistle blowers represent both a threat and an opportunity for compliance officers. The obvious threat for compliance officers is that an employee who has identified an area of non-compliance within the company chooses to report the issue to an external regulator, the ramifications of which may include heavy penalties for the company. New whistle blower legislation in the US has made this option far more attractive for US employees, who could potentially receive around 30% of the recoveries that result from their cooperation. Click Here To Read More

Privacy Progress Preparations: How are you tracking?

Privacy Progress Preparations: How are you tracking?The Australian Privacy Commissioner Timothy Pilgrim released a statement on 25 January urging companies to begin preparing for the upcoming privacy reforms, due to come into effect in March 2014. In the release, the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) is recommending businesses prepare for the reforms by reviewing:

  • privacy policies and information collection notices
  • any outsourcing arrangements that might be in place, particularly if these involve the disclosure of personal information outside Australia
  • direct marketing practices, including the availability of ‘opt out’ mechanisms. Click Here To Read More

Employees charged, but not the employer: reduce your liability risk

Employees charged, but not the employer: reduce your liability riskThere is an increasing level of scrutinisation of businesses and how they operate by corporate regulators. As the investigatory powers of the regulators gain strength, as well as wider access to more sophisticated monitoring technology, companies should be shifting their focus from “do we need to have a compliance training program” to, “how much compliance training is enough?”

Click Here To Read More

HSBC agrees to record $1.92 billion settlement for AML failures

HSBC made history this week by agreeing to pay a record $1.92 billion in settlement for failing to enforce rules designed to prevent the proceeds of criminal activity finding its way into the financial system. While the huge sum of money ensured sensational news headlines, the Deferred Prosecution Agreement signed by HSBC offers valuable information to compliance professionals on the broader repercussions of compliance and AML program failures. The agreement outlines the remedial measures and changes that must be undertaken by HSBC to address sanctions and money laundering risks, providing an indication of the true cost to a business found guilty of non-compliance with AML laws. Click Here To Read More

Use Compliance Data to Improve Business Performance

Use Compliance Data to Improve Business PerformanceAustralian business and market regulators are becoming more assertive in enforcing legal compliance and many regulators are being afforded more power to pursue suspects. Both the ACCC and ASIC, for example, have recently been given more power to investigate suspicious activities, and the maximum penalties and fines for those found guilty of offences have been increased significantly. In response, businesses are becoming more proactive in allocating greater resources to ensure compliance processes are up to date, and adequate in the eyes of the regulators. Click Here To Read More

Lance Peddles Hard Lesson in Compliance

Lance Peddles Hard Lesson in Compliance

For over a decade, Lance Armstrong has enjoyed the reputation of a hero. The world watched as he showed extraordinary personal strength to defeat cancer, and then win a record 7 consecutive Tour de France titles. We loved him as the cycling champion that trained harder, was more focused and raced faster than any of his competitors. Although there were rumours of performance enhancing drugs, most of us just believed Lance Armstrong was naturally the most dominant cyclist ever.

Fast forward to October 2012 – all that has changed. USADA (United States Anti-Doping Agency) released a 1000 page report containing compelling evidence of Lance Armstrong’s history of illegal doping. The report includes the sworn testimony of 26 people, including 15 of Armstrong’s former teammates, confirming illegal doping practices by Armstrong and his professional cycling team, US Postal Service (USPS). The report also details financial payments, emails and scientific data that, according to USADA, prove the use, possession and distribution of performance enhancing drugs by Armstrong and the USPS cycling team.

A Toxic Workplace Culture

Click Here To Read More

Learning Management System | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions
All Rights Reserved. Copyright 2012.